基于学生体育过程性考核测评指标的相关关系分析
   来源:中国科技博览     2021年06月06日 18:21

王辉

[摘 要]本文主要采用了模糊数学中的相关关系知识点对不同体育专项成绩之间的相互影响程度进行了计算,为同学们进行体育锻炼提供了建议。

[关键词]体育,素质,耐力,专项,相关关系

中图分类号:G807.0 文献标识码:A 文章编号:1009-914X(2016)18-0234-01

每个班级总有几个不愿意参加体育活动的同学,他们认为自己跑不快也跳不高,所以想当然的认为自己不可能擅长任何体育项目,所以总是找各种借口逃避参加体育活动,久而久之,身体素质也在下降,失去了年轻人应该具有的耐力和敏捷程度等。事实上,即使有多种体育项目不擅长也不能构成不擅长所有体育项目的充分条件。下面将通过分别统计对比15名女同学和15名男同学在体育不同专项上的成绩并计算其相关关系的方法来说明这一论点。

考虑到女生和男生身体素质方面的差异以及所测成绩的项目不完全相同的实际情况,下面将分别对女生和男生的体育分项成绩的相关关系进行计算。从本校某班级按学号从前往后各选取15名女生和15名男生,体育分项成绩测评数据见表1:

说明:1、中长跑测得是1500米跑步时间,由于表格中出现的其他分项均以计数得分,计数与得分成正比,而1500米成绩以时间计分,时间长短与分数是反比关系,为方便后面的计算和分析,将1500米成绩直接以分数形式给出。

2、篮球成绩:为罚球线上定点投篮,每人10次机会计进球数。

3、仰卧起坐成绩:为1分钟内计数。

4、排球成绩:个人颠球数目,以球落地结束一次计数。

5、引体向上成绩:以落地结束一次计数。

两个模糊集、之间的接近程度可以用贴近度函数来描述,

距离贴近度:。

下面通过计算抽取的15位女同学对应的3门体育专项成绩指标之间的贴近程度来分析各专项成绩评价指标之间的相关程度的大小。首先15位女同学对应的3个专项成绩评价指标的相对隶属度值经过归一化处理后得到:

(中长跑成绩)=(0.059,0.072,0.068,0.068,0.072,0.068,0.064,0.064,0.067,0.065,0.061,0.070,0.063,0.067,0.072)

(篮球成绩)=(0.048,0.048,0.079,0.063,0.048,0.048,0.048,0.048,0.111,0.063,0.095,0.095,0.079,0.063,0.063)

(仰卧起坐成绩)=(0.090,0.060,0.068,0.068,0.068,0.068,0.080,0.090,0.040,0.053,0.045,0.045,0.058,0.068,0.098)

计算结果见下表,

下面再来计算抽取的15位男同学对应的3门体育专项成绩指标之间的贴近程度来分析各专项成绩评价指标之间的相关程度的大小。首先15位男同学对应的3个专项成绩评价指标的相对隶属度值经过归一化处理后得到:

(中长跑成绩)=(0.060,0.072,0.072,0.070,0.068,0.053,0.064,0.067,0.069,0.066,0.075,0.063,0.066,0.063,0.072)

(排球成绩)=(0.076,0.122,0.052,0.041,0.038,0.049,0.052,0.055,0.049,0.041,0.122,0.047,0.110,0.035,0.110)

(引体向上成绩)=(0.076,0.101,0.063,0.076,0.063,0.038,0.051,0.051,0.038,0.063,0.101,0.063,0.089,0.038,0.089)

计算结果见下表,

男生各分项成绩评价指标之间的相关程度:

由择近原则可知,无论是第一组三个模糊集、和之间,还是第二组三个模糊集、和之间都没有非常贴近的,不论是女生测评的三项还是男生测评的三项,各项成绩之间的相关关系都不是很高。这说明一个专项的成绩好并不能意味着别的项目成绩也好,同样的道理,一个专项的成绩不好,也不能说明其他的项目就一定练不好。现在大多数的高校体育课程安排都是非常丰富多彩的,既考虑到大多数同学锻炼的实际情况也有人性化的安排。所以建议同学们不要轻易的否定自己,多进行尝试找到自己喜欢并且较为擅长的项目进行锻炼,提高自身的身体素质。

参考文献

[1] 刘合香.模糊数学理论及其应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.

[2] 罗承忠.模糊集引论(上下册)[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1989.

文章 成绩 专项